Yes, the width of this table base is adjustable. In addition to the electrically adjustable height, its width can be adjusted to suit a range of tabletop sizes.
According to the information on the TecTake website, as long as the table top is between 100 x 50 and 160 x 80 cm, it should be compatible.
The manufacturer states that the table base and assembly instructions are provided but does not give any details about the screws, we are sorry about that. If necessary, you can contact the brand via contact@tectake.fr.
This is a table with only one motor, they can usually lift a maximum of 50 kg and that's pretty little, I would definitely choose a table that has two motors, they are much more robust and it doesn't take half an eternity to set the desired height. I would take this one, it is a bit more expensive, but it has two motors and is therefore able to support a weight of up to 125 kg (here you can see quite clearly, one motor table frames are for the cat, although it could of course also support such a one :) ).
Digitus table frame (170 cm)
This should not be a problem, but I would strongly advise a table frame that has a lifting motor in each leg. The solutions with only one lift motor are exposed to greater loads and cannot lift as much.
The Fellowes system is not very expensive and allows the tabletop to be mounted without screws. The assembly is super easy, you only need to unfold the table legs and then attach the table top with the supplied assembly option. According to the manufacturer, this takes less than 2 minutes. The Fellowes Levando frame can accommodate table tops from 120 - 180 cm.
Fellowes Levando (62.20 cm)
[https://www.fellowes.com/de/de/loesungen/fellowespraesentiert/height-adjustable-desks.aspx
I have an 80/180/28mm solid wood top, 2 laptops, 2 24" monitors, 2 keyboards and about 10kg extra on it. And the frame has never complained. So the 70kg could be right.
Greetings
Not that much, this frame has a single motor design, meaning it will be slow and eventually fail because of the stress that is put on the motor. I recommend a frame with a dual motor design, they usually can hold 100 or more kg in weight and are also much faster when adjusting the height of the table.
My recommendation for a frame with a dual motor would to go this one, it is a bit higher than the price range of the suboptimal frame, but it is well worth the extra money spent.
LogiLink Schreibtisch (100 cm)
According to the other discussions in German, 71cm can't be. They mention 79cm being the absolute minimum out of the box but I haven't found anyone who tried to use it at that width.
Because we no longer sell this product. If you have experienced a problem with your order, please contact customer service and include photos with your request. We thank you for your feedback.
I guess any that respects the dimensions in the diagram (https://www.galaxus.ch/im/Files/3/6/3/0/7/6/8/5/402999-1.jpg?impolicy=ProductTileImage&resizeWidth=436&resizeHeight=335&cropWidth=436&cropHeight=335). We use a standard IKEA tabletop, 75/155cm
I advise against buying this table stand. It has only one motor and such stands are not ideal for height adjustment. The adjustment speed is often meh and a single motor is subjected to a greater load. I therefore recommend buying a table frame with a double motor system integrated in the table legs. They are much more robust and durable. Something like this is more suitable and doesn't cost much more. The depth of this frame also goes up to 60mm.
equip ERGO electric sit-stand table frame double motor (100cm)
The motor probably drives a linkage of some kind, and this is probably only present on one foot. But I advise against single-engine frames in principle. If the frame is operated with only one motor, that is not optimal and there are also weight restrictions. A decent table top can weigh 20 kg or more.
I would take this underframe, it makes a much more solid impression, there are two motors in it, it fits better:
equip ERGO electric sit-stand table frame double motor (100cm)
Hm, to be able to answer the question precisely, I would have to dismantle my tabletop again and then see how far I can push the feet together. But when I look at the frame without dismantling it, 85 cm minimum width seems rather too correct.