LG UltraFine 32UN880-B (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 31.50")
CHF544.– currently CHF843.– new

LG UltraFine 32UN880-B

3840 x 2160 Pixels, 31.50"


Questions about LG UltraFine 32UN880-B

What would you like to know?

Avatar

0 questions and answers

avatar
Anonymous

4 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

4 years ago

avatar
nicolasgautier

4 years ago

avatar
seilercornelia

2 years ago

avatar
12th

2 years ago

I cannot give a reliable answer because a "minimum" depends on the load. So it may be that when the load falls below a certain value, in combination with an unfavourable position of the arm and a person who still pushes the monitor down (adjusts the height), the load on the table or the foot becomes too great. I can tell you, however, that I use just less than the maximum (highest stability) because I bump up against the cable management thingies. For me it's about 8.8cm or just under 9cm and I'm missing about 3-4mm. If you only have 7.5cm or less available, I feel a bit queasy. 9cm and above should fit without any problems. Alternatively, you could probably drill a hole in the table, if you don't already have one, and mount the monitor that way. The radius/diameter is certainly standardised. But here too: no guarantee for my information.

avatar
12th

4 years ago

avatar
bacherma

4 years ago

avatar
sim_dim

3 months ago

avatar
Galaxus

3 months ago

The difference between the LG UltraFine 32UN880-B and the LG 32UN88OP-B does not appear to be fully documented. However, there is no evidence of significant technical differences between these models. It could be a mix-up or a typo, as the LG 32UN88OP-B is not mentioned in the available information. If you're looking for a comparison, I recommend checking the technical specifications directly at LG Electronics or comparing the models you have in mind.

Automatically generated from the .
avatar
walter.steiner1

2 years ago

avatar
smileone

2 years ago

Helpful answer

Hello Walter I bought the following cable for my MacBook Pro (16" 2021) at digitec: Delock Thunderbolt 3 Cable (2 m)

avatar
Anonymous

2 years ago

avatar
Stardustone

2 years ago

With some restrictions it would work, but the refresh rate of 60 Hz is not ideal, 120 Hz would be better and also with the HDMI connections, okay, it would work, but HDMI 2.1 would be more optimal. This Dell screen covers both, it also has HDMI 2.1 connections and is also specially designed for gaming: Dell G3223Q (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 32 ")

avatar
Myhre

3 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

3 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

3 years ago

Helpful answer

You can adjust it, but then you have to choose between zoomed picture and small picture in the middle, with huge black bars all around.

avatar
Anonymous

3 years ago

avatar
Stardustone

3 years ago

Helpful answer

The notebook must have the following so that 4K UHD with 3840 x 2160 pixels in 60Hz can be transmitted: - HDMI 2.0 or better (unfortunately, most notebooks have HDMI 1.4, which is then sufficient for 4K but only for 30Hz) - DisplayPort 1.2 or higher (many notebooks can even use DisplayPort 1.4) The monitor then needs HDMI 2.0 or higher or DisplayPort 1.2 or better. Be careful when using such USB-C docking solutions, many can only do 4K 60Hz (especially the cheaper ones). So if the notebook can do Thunderbolt, then everything should be OK. As a rule, DisplayPort 1.4 is output. Since the screen has USB-C, I would connect it to it. That shouldn't be a problem.

30 of 46 questions

To Top