Product test

Theory vs. practice: Photographer tests photographer monitor

David Lee
21.2.2019
Translation: machine translated
Pictures: Andrej Barnes

Andrej has a great passion for photography. He has now switched from an older office monitor to a new screen specially designed for graphic designers and photographers. I wanted to know how this would benefit him in everyday life.

Andrej Barnes works as an Account Manager at Digitec Galaxus AG, which means he looks after business customers. But that's not important here. What is important is that Andrej takes photos. A lot, with pleasure and well. And he wants a new screen.

As a photographer, Andrej has constantly developed and upgraded his equipment. His Samsung SyncMaster S27A350H from 2011 no longer meets his requirements. On the one hand, the screen is simply no longer up to date, and on the other, it is not a specialised graphics monitor. So Andrej picks up the BenQ SW271, a monitor designed specifically for photographers and graphic designers. After a month of use, I ask him what it has done for him.

Better because it's newer - but that's not the only reason

However, you don't have to buy a special photography monitor for this - UHD is now also available for very little money. The brightness values are very similar. The 350 cd/m² is a step forward compared to Andrej's old screen (300 cd/m²), and he is correspondingly enthusiastic: "The white is now really white." But even monitors designed for the office and reasonably priced can deliver this today.

Andrej notes that the colours now match the colours on his camera screen better. And the colour match with smartphone screens is also better. However, he also attributes this to the fact that the new monitor really displays black as black. Just as is the case on many of today's smartphones. The 2011 screen simply does not produce a deep enough black level, which means that photos on mobile phone screens inevitably look different to those on a PC.

Colour representation

A good black level is important for Andrej. He likes dark, bold shadows, but has a precise idea of exactly how dark they should be. His style and way of working is also a good example of the fact that it really depends on what kind of photos you take and for what purpose.

A part of Andrej's style is that he desaturates bright colours quite radically. This means that he very rarely gets into an area that is not covered by sRGB. As you can see from the following diagram, it is mainly maximally saturated green tones that cannot be represented by sRGB. Colours that hardly appear in his pictures anyway.

Andrej also prints photos, and Adobe RGB would definitely make a difference. However, due to his image style, Andrej has no problem working with sRGB here either. He is in a comfortable situation with his new screen: he could use Adobe RGB if he needed to. But it has never been until now.

When it comes to printouts, he has other problems anyway: "To put the finishing touches to the colouring, I'd have to be able to print my photos myself, in other words, have a high-quality photo printer."

At the moment, he has his pictures printed. This way, it is hardly possible to experiment until everything is just right.

The ambient light

Colours, brightness, contrast - it all depends on the light in the room. The BenQ SW271 therefore comes with a light protection screen that blocks light coming in from the side.

This is supposed to be about Andrej's photo monitor, but at this point I can't resist a little off-topic rant:

Back to Andrej. He can adjust the light in his home so that nothing dazzles. He does that too. The light is always constant in his home anyway, so the glare is not so important. But it's still a nice bonus. Incidentally, it can also be pulled over the screen when it is rotated by 90 degrees. Another feature that Andrej doesn't need ...

The BenQ SW271 does not have a brightness sensor to regulate the light automatically. In constant room light in combination with the bezel, this is not necessary - not even for perfectionists. The feature is particularly common on notebooks, smartphones and TVs, and less so on PC screens. And even there you will find it mainly in the "entertainment" sector.

Conclusion

35 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

My interest in IT and writing landed me in tech journalism early on (2000). I want to know how we can use technology without being used. Outside of the office, I’m a keen musician who makes up for lacking talent with excessive enthusiasm.


Computing
Follow topics and stay updated on your areas of interest

Photo and video
Follow topics and stay updated on your areas of interest

Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Product test

    Philips 5K2K monitor review: big, sharp and pricey

    by Samuel Buchmann

  • Product test

    FlipGo Dual test: a portable monitor for digital nomads

    by Samuel Buchmann

  • Product test

    Samsung Odyssey 3D tested: The third dimension remains a gimmick

    by Samuel Buchmann