I have all 3 device variants in use at various locations and it would be completely new to me if the small USG was no longer updated via controller and thus end-of-life or "no longer up2date"...
For the upgrades (except for one location with UDM-Pro) I also use my own Ubuntu VM with installed Unifi controller software and keep different generations of USG and switches up2date without any problems.
Yes, the DING can handle DPI.
And many other things that you would not expect from such a thing.
https://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/unifi/UniFi_Security_Gateway_DS.pdf
Greetings
Paladium
Hi Lars, you can simply use a universal power supply with at least 12V 1A. For example the item 11511239 here at digitec. It has a little more power (1.5A) and various plugs.
since i have no idea what your it knowledge is... i assume that the "swisscom side" has 192.168.x.x address range... have you configured the usg so that it is in a different network ip-wise? can you ping your default gw from the usg? there can be about 1000 things wrong somewhere.
According to https://www.sunrise.ch/content/dam/sunrise/residential/hilfe/internet/Sunrise_Home_Handbuch_Sunrise_Internet_Box_neue_firmware_d.pdf it should be possible to set the router to bridge mode.
The phones only work with the Wingo Internet Box. With DSL, the USG is also not suitable as a replacement, as you need a VDSL or G.DSL-capable device. See https://www.wingo.ch/de/kann-ich-fuer-wingo-internet-meinen-eigenen-router-verwenden
You will therefore have to operate the USG behind the Wingo Box. I have also solved this problem including TV.
It depends on what you want to do. By default (i.e. from the controller software) you can use the second LAN (or WAN2) interface only for failover purposes, otherwise you have to create a config.gateway.json file that configures the port (see various discussions in https://community.ui.com). Otherwise, work with separate VLANs (if the DMZ is virtualised), or use the Salt router as the outer router and the Ubiquiti as the inner router (with or without NAT).
Is that a question or a statement? Regarding the CH power cable, I can't shake the feeling that they occasionally avoid including an adapter, which they really should ;-)
I have already contacted Digitec customer service for various products where this was the case and it was delivered free of charge. But yes... it should have been included right from the start.
If the MR600 behaves like a normal router, I don't think there is anything wrong with it. I operate the ISG on 2 routers in parallel, with failover in case the first one drops out. One of them is a cable modem from UPC, the other a Fritzbox.
I also use Unifi infrastructure in my home network. The Unifi firmware updates sometimes affect the WLAN performance, but the switches and gateway have never had any problems in my config. Have you already measured the wired performance directly behind the router?
yes and no ^^ you can use both devices but then you have double nat which isn't really great and won't do you much good. noramlerwise you use a different router and don't connect two together for that but you would have to swap your centro with an ftth converter so that the public ip is on the security gateway. it would be easier if you could say what you want to achieve with this or why you want this product? because it is probably the wrong one :)
Yes, I have this in operation. Together with a media converter (Art-Nr 2739939).
Select VLAN ID 10 via Unifi Controller (Windows software) (Configuration-->WAN).
Enter the following via SSH (Putty):
configure
set interfaces ethernet eth0 description "Internet Swisscom".
edit interfaces ethernet eth0 vif 10 dhcp-options
set client-option "send vendor-class-identifier "100008,0001";"
commit
save
This is the short version of this manual or help:
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/EdgeRouter-setup-for-Swiss-FTTH-providers/td-p/1658929
The problem is that the USG loses the settings at every restart. To prevent this, a json file must be created to load the settings automatically.
Explanations can be found here:
https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/215458888-UniFi-How-to-further-customize-USG-configuration-with-config-gateway-json
The whole thing needs some time to get used to but runs stable afterwards.
Well, the power supply unit is 12 V, they are a dime a dozen (and you usually have some lying around somewhere from other devices). Actually, it's only a question of whether the hollow plug on the USG fits (positive inner conductor, that's practically the case with everything, but there are different diameters - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohlstecker). You just have to try it out to see if there is a contact.
There are also universal power supplies with many different plugs, but will one fit?
I now operate 4 networks with Unifi components via a controller VM.
Everything works perfectly so far. But the USG-3P is no longer really up to date technically...
The USG4-Pro, on the other hand, is simply too big. How is it supposed to be possible to fit it in somewhere sensible? Apart from the power consumption... And you hear/read a lot about the DreamMachine - only a few good things. And with the UDM-Pro, there's the problem of the design again.
Hence the question:
Is there anything known that Ubiquiti will update the small USG?
Hey, I have a similar problem, I've been waiting since October for the USG I ordered, but the delivery date keeps getting postponed. It said 13 January, now it says "unknown" again. I have now investigated and it looks like the product is obsolete and has been replaced by Ubiquiti with the "UniFi Next-Gen Gateway Lite" or as it is called on the homepage "Gateway Lite": https://eu.store.ui.com/eu/en/collections/unifi-accessory-tech-hosting-and-gateways-small-scale/products/uxg-lite
And yes, you won't find it on Digitec because they call it something else, namely "Ubiquiti UniFi UXG" -> Ubiquiti UniFi UXG
I can't guarantee that this is correct, it's just what I've found out so far. I think it's pretty bad that Digitec doesn't somehow realise this and point it out to us in one way or another. Yes, you can't even compare the two devices, as the USG is defined as a "router" (which is not true at all) and the AXG as an "access point"...
Hoi - it's not a switch, but a firewall and you could meshen the access points... That is, one connects to the other via Wifi... Otherwise: Keep the router (you will probably need it anyway from your ISP?) and use a simple 0815 switch and connect both APs to it....and to the switch to the router.
Depending on the AP, these have 1 or 2 network outlets (and sometimes you can use them, sometimes pair them). You'll have to check the schemas for your APS at Unifi.
I have 3 APs in the basement - one is via RJ45 uplink to a switch (just from Unifi because it was cheap at the time and LACP was so easy to use) - the other two: 1 is via mesh (wifi) to the one with uplink, the other via second switch via RJ45 to the one via mesh.... works too.
With mesh you lose some bandwidth... but for my purposes that is completely sufficient.
LG
I replaced my old Netgear router with the USG. Since then I have had a massive deterioration in download speed of at least 50%. My Quickline subscription has an upload/download speed of up to 100 Mbps. According to the speed test, I currently have 16 Mbps download and 16 Mbps upload speed. The performance is so bad that even webcam or Youtube videos get bogged down. I have read in many forums that there are performance problems with this device. What is your experience and tips so that I can remove this bottleneck.
Hello Together
I switched to the Unifi network (Switch 60W, USG, Cloud Key, AP NanoHD) because my Fritzbox 7490 was overloaded.
Since then I have been able to work stably in my home office for a long time.
About 1 month ago, various patches for the Unifi components came out and I installed them. Around the same time, massive problems started during telephone conferences in Skype or TeamSpeak. My upload has very strong fluctuations between 0.5Mbit and 110Mbit. The download is not affected.
Now I am not sure if this is due to the patches or the ISP (UPC Cablecom is).
Does anyone here have any ideas?
Hello short question:
We would like to combine a Swisscom setup with 5 access points from Ubiquiti.
In order to have as few problems as possible, we would connect the telephone and the two TV boxes directly to the Swisscom router. The Ubiquiti USG would then be connected to another output of the Swisscom router, followed by the US-24-250W PoE switch and then 5 AP nano HD and 2-3 other devices. A great extension would of course be that when someone unplugs the TV box and attaches his PC, he cannot access the devices behind the USG. Does this make sense? Does it work like I imagine it would? I would be very grateful for any feedback. :-)
that's no problem. i have it exactly the same way because i don't want swisscom on my network.
swisscom router--usg-div.switches-apacpro
on the swisscom router 2 tv uhd tv boxes
connection router-usg: usg on dhcp everything standard, nothing adjusted
important: you need two different networks: so router-side default e.g. 192.168.1.0 your network: 10.0.0.0
I have operated the whole thing with a raspberry pi as a unifi network controller.
without extended setup it is clear that the "home functionalities" of SC cannot be used in the advertised environment. but I don't need it because I have a chromecast on the tv which is connected to the internal network and so I can also bring everything from the internal network to the tv.
good luck
Rocksresort Laax: win a stay for 4 people
Get involved in the Community and win!
We're giving away a voucher for Rocksresort Laax: 2 nights in a family flat for 4 people.
