Product test

The big smoothie and juice test: Which appliance delivers the most vitamins?

Cinzia Memper
3.5.2017
Translation: Jessica Johnson-Ferguson

Fruit and veg juices and smoothies are on everyone’s lips. The market has been flooded with countless gadgets using various technologies to make these highly appraised vitamin bombs. But how many nutrients do the various technologies get out of fruit and vegetables? This question was raised by Swiss consumer TV show “à bon entendeur” (ABE) – they tested blenders, centrifugal juicers and standard juicers.

Juice bars and smoothie shops are popping up like mushrooms all over Switzerland. What’s more, there has also been a drastic rise in home blending and juicing to create drinkable vitamin bombs. The market for making freshly-squeezed juices and smoothies is dominated by three technologies: blenders, centrifugal juicers (also called high-speed juicers) and regular juicers (aka slow juicers with cold-pressing technology).

The test:

Three medium to high-priced appliances were used for the test. For the centrifugal juicer, the smallest sieve was used. The ingredients: Two oranges, one apple, one celery stalk, one carrot and a handful of spinach – all organic. The ingredients were chosen for their high vitamin content and compatibility with the tested appliances.

The fruit and veg was washed and the oranges were peeled. All ingredients were cut into thirds in order to give all three kitchen appliances the exact same amount and composition to process.

Test criteria

The juices were analysed in a laboratory for the following nutrients:

  • Vitamin C (main source: orange and apple)
  • Folic acid (source: spinach and celery stalk)
  • Vitamin B6 (from the carrot and spinach)
  • Vitamin A (also known as beta-carotene contained in the spinach and carrot)
  • Vitaming K (contained in spinach, celery stalk and in the carrot)

Test results

Blender

Processing the ingredients in the blender leaves no waste. All the nutrients – that’s 100% of the vitamins – are used in the drink.

Viiew all blenders

Centrifugal juicer

40% loss of fruit and veg, mainly due to the fact that a lot of fibre is not used in the drink. Compared to the blender results, this is how many vitamins remained in the drink:

  • Vitamin C: 79%
  • Folic acid: 63% (corresponds to weight loss)
  • Vitamin B6: 40%
  • Beta-Carotene: 57%
  • Vitamin K: 27%

View all centrifugal juicers

Juicer

Around 40% of the fruit and veg (waste, pulp and fibre) were lost in cold-pressed juices. The vitamin content compared to the blender results was as follows:

  • Vitamin C: 100%
  • Folic acid: 61% (corresponds to weight loss)
  • Vitamin B6: 52%
  • Beta-Carotene: 28%
  • Vitamin K: 22%

View all slow juicers

Conclusion

Both the juicer and centrifugal juicer generated a relatively high vitamin loss – with the exception of vitamin C, which the slow juicer preserved 100% and the high speed juicer 80%. Therefore, the blender remains the best appliance when it comes to preserving the most vitamins. However, the thick consistency of the juice it makes is not everybody’s cup of tea or cup of juice. By adding water, it can be thinned down.

Go to ABE test report

17 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

Discovering foreign countries and cultures and tasting coffee or other delicacies is what I enjoy most when I travel. My home is decorated with little gems I find in thrift shops and at flea markets. When I’m having one of my big DIY moments, my creativity is unleashed. Both the mountains and the seaside restore my inner balance. With a snowboard or surfboard under my feet, I’m happy. 


Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all